I’ve looked quickly at Mercury’s Quick Test Professional for one year and my impression was that it was a tool with features allowing it to get sold to managers but not for efficient day to day test automation usage.
I’ve discussed recently with a colleague having worked 2 years with QTP and now working since nearly one year with WebTest. I was interested to hear from someone with real QTP experience how the comparison would sound.
He misses 2 QTP features in WebTest:
- the possibility to combine tests of web applications with test in other Window applications (like a test starting with a host connection and going on in a browser)
- the possibility to “see” the responses during the test execution which helps beginners
but considers WebTest as really superior to build reliable, easy to maintain tests of web applications mostly because:
- no time lost for synchronisation configuration during the creation of tests
- native support for XPath
- easy to integrate in continuous integration
- reports provide comprehensive on failed tests
- easily extendible
This mainly confirms my first appreciation: QTP is a tool for people that don’t test!
Perhaps should we go away from Open Source and change WebTest’s license to sell it, let’s say, just half the price of QTP